Archive | May, 2012

Chloe (***), Gone (**), The Chernobyl Diaries (**1/2), and The Woman in Black (**1/2)

30 May

A few movies to catch up on tonight, two of which happen to star Amanda Seyfried. Chloe is Atom Egoyan’s interesting tale of a middle-aged couple (Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore) who have a comfortable life and a lovely home shared with their teenaged son. Moore suspects that Neeson, a college professor, has been conducting an affair or two with his students. She notices a young prostitute (Seyfried) working near her office and, figuring that her husband would be attracted to her youth, concocts a plan to have the prostitute “accidentally” meet him and gauge his capacity for infidelity.

I’m not sure what most viewers would think of such a plan. As someone who believes in flexible relationships and honesty between partners, I figured it would end badly, and of course it does. I did appreciate that Egoyan’s script is complex enough that it does not demonize the prostitute, even as the relationship between the two women gets a lot more intimate. I did not always care for where the plot wanted to take me – especially in the end – but the actors did well with what they were given. Like some of his other films, Egoyan mixes eroticism with an examination of the moments in relationships that are rarely discussed.

Gone, on the other hand, is a by-the-numbers revenge picture where Seyfried is given a second chance to confront her kidnapper when he returns and takes her sister instead. She tries to tell the police, but they do not believe her, nor do they believe that she was ever kidnapped, due to lack of evidence. So, the film chiefly consists of her doggedly pursuing one slender clue after another, occasionally doubting her own sanity, but generally focused on revenge.

The Chernobyl Diaries was a surprisingly effective horror film set (of course) in the abandoned city adjacent to what remains of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, which had a catastrophic meltdown over 25 years ago. Four young Americans and a couple of other tourists hire a Russian called Uri to take them there on what he promises to be a unique opportunity: to walk through the buildings of a place that had to be abandoned immediately. When they arrive at a security checkpoint, Uri is surprised that the guards refuse them entry, so he offers to take them in through a back road.

The tour proceeds as advertised; Uri parks his van in the town square and they walk through an apartment building, viewing the ruined power station from a balcony. Uri explains that the radiation levels are safe as long as they do not stay long and as long as they do not go close to the plant. When they return to the van and discover their distributor cap severed, you can imagine how things start to go terribly wrong.

The Chernobyl Diaries is not a great film but it is far better than I expected, especially in the first two thirds when the cast is still making their way through a creepy foreign landscape. I was not as enthusiastic about the nature of what terrorizes them, but it was appropriate enough given the setup. It felt like a bit of a wasted opportunity in the end.

The Woman in Black is probably best known for being Daniel Radcliffe’s first film after Harry Potter, and he is suitably serious as a young widower and father tasked with sorting through the estate of a house off the shore of a decidedly cursed English village. The house is haunted by the woman in black, who hung herself after her young son drowned in the nearby marsh due to the someone else’s negligence. Now, whenever the local children die – which is often – she can be seen in the background, driving them to do it.

Plotwise, The Woman in Black mixes both standard ghost story tropes with more contemporary ideas about how (and if) the ghost can be placated. The art direction is the true star here, not quite reaching the level of Alajandro Amenabar’s The Others but definitely in the same ballpark. Amusingly, this big-screen version shares the same source novel as a 1989 TV-movie starring Adrian Rawlins, who also played James Potter. From what I recall of the TV version, this new version is significantly darker.

Goon (***)

28 May

Canadian actor Jay Baruchel wrote and co-stars in this adaptation of the life story of Doug Smith, an unlikely hockey star who played here in the Maritimes a generation ago. Seann William Scott plays Doug Glatt, the black sheep of a high-achieving family who is not the quickest thinker but has a good heart and impeccable manners, going so far as to apologize to the drunks he throws out of a local bar.

While coming to the defense of his gay brother, Doug catches the attention of a local hockey coach and is invited to a tryout. He can’t skate and does not have a very good instinct for the game, but he can take and deliver punches better than anyone. With some assistance, he catches up on the basics and is traded to a minor-league team to serve as protection for a troubled young prospect. Along the way he meets and develops a crush on a local hockey fan called Eva (Scott Pilgrim’s Alison Pill).

You might expect a film about hockey (and especially fighting in hockey) to try to be the next Slap Shot, but Goon is a lot more like Bull Durham: a charming and authentic world that we have the pleasure to visit. It’s the best performance I can recall by Scott with a solid supporting cast.

Perfect Sense (***1/2)

27 May

Touching Scottish film starring Ewen McGregor and Eva Green as a chef and medical researcher who fall in love while an epidemic slowly works its way around the world, robbing people of their senses; first smell, then taste, and so on. It deftly jumps between the depiction of a potential extinction event and the tenuous bond between two lovers with issues.

Settling In

26 May

Yikes, three weeks since my last post. It’s been a busy time, primarily concerned with the birthdays of the two people I love most in the world (Jack turning 10 and Nicole turning 25), driving up to Kingston, and driving back with Nicole and the cats. As I write this we are one small happy family together under one roof for the summer, with regular visits to and from Jack. I like traveling, and enjoyed the trains to Kingston, but I am glad to have the break. Regular relationship commuting resumes in September.

For now, Nicole is looking for summer employment and reading for her comprehensive exams in the fall. I am working as usual during the weekdays and spending my off-hours with family and friends, getting some drawing done, and trying to slowly pull the trigger on some long-overdue publishing efforts as described on the “In Progress” page. I’ve also been enjoying some gaming, from SSX, Rocksmith and Lego Pirates of the Caribbean on the PS3 to Temple Run on the iPad. I’ve also been enjoying an iPad app called Epic Win that combines the dry duty of a to-do list with rewards and levelling up in an RPG.

Thanks to Free Comic Book Day and the local library sale and other bits of splurging, my books-to-read pile grows ever larger, from Borges’ Ficciones to Jim Woodring’s The Portable Frank to an omnibus of mystery novels by Peter Robinson. I also downloaded a bunch of classic SF novels in audiobook form for the recent transprovincial drives. Maybe I am feeling sympathy pains for Nicole’s comps reading, but lately I have been feeling like I should be reading just a bit more in the way of literature, especially the classics, and not just genre stuff. I may try alternating between the reading pile and a Canonical Work of Literature in English. We’ll see.

Speaking of reading, I recently lucked out with a couple of impulse buys at the comic shop. The first was a thing called New Mutants Forever by Chris Claremont, Al Rio and Bob McLeod, a 2010 miniseries that picks up directly after where Claremont left off over 20 years before. It was quite a trip to be transported back to that version of the Marvel Universe, before all those horrible ’90s “event” crossovers. The other was the first collection of Locke and Key, by Stephen King’s son Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez; an above-average ghost house story for the YA audience and above. I wasn’t always on board with Rodriguez’ artwork but I would certainly like to read the next volume and see how it plays out. I hear good things about Hill’s other books too.

I was really bummed that I had to miss this year’s Toronto Comic Arts Festival (TCAF), it was just not possible to do with all the other stuff going on that week; I am determined to make it next year, which is coincidentally the tenth year, and perhaps even exhibit if I can get my shit together with the cartooning and the publishing and the flavening. In the meantime I will be appearing at the inaugural instalment of a local con called Harbour Con-Fusion in July. After a reasonably successful attempt at doing a commission for a friend, I will be attempting to add that to my rotation as well. Once I have a portfolio of samples ready and some rates worked out, I’ll add a page about it here.

The Avengers [2012] (****)

5 May

This review is of course about the Marvel movie directed by Joss Whedon, not the much less interesting adaptation of the classic British series about John Steed and Mrs. Peel. Though it would be fun to see Whedon try his hand at that too.

Well, what can I say? Marvel promised a lot with its credit cookies, starting in Iron Man and leading up through last year’s Captain America film, and all of the setup films were pretty good, even great, with the exception of Iron Man 2. So how good is The Avengers? It’s about as good as all those other films put together. Indeed, it is up there with X-Men: First Class and Spider-Man 2 in terms of pure superhero film vision.

It could have gone horribly wrong. After all, The Avengers comics have gone up and down over the years and if someone were to ask me “what is the definitive Avengers story?” I would have no answer. But now I do. It’s this story, by Whedon and Zack Penn, neatly unifying a number of subplots from all the other films. After striking a deal with an alien army, Loki has returned to Earth to find the Tesseract, which we used to call the Cosmic Cube when I was a kid. This all-powerful artifact is under guard by S.H.I.E.L.D., but they do not quite have the resources to defend against Loki, so after a certain bit of ado, ta-da! The Avengers. And that is all I will give away about the plot.

The movie is long, but doesn’t feel long. The first half is concerned with assembling the team, getting a sense of how the different personalities do and do not mesh, and the second half is an insane city-destroying battle; pretty much all that you would hope to see in a story where the stakes have to be high enough to call in “Earth’s mightiest heroes”. Everyone has time to shine at least a little and Whedon lingers especially on Captain America and Iron Man, which makes sense I suppose due to their recent storylines in the Civil War comics. I enjoyed Hawkeye and Black Widow far more than I expected and certainly more than I ever did in the comics.

But the real revelation for me in this film was The Hulk. I liked the first two Hulk films well enough, for what they were; but I love him in this movie. Mark Ruffalo does a superb job as the tortured Dr. Banner, now able to exercise more self-control and function in a team. The Hulk also gets some tremendous moments in the battle, a couple of which made me laugh very hard. British actor Tom Hiddleston is a close runner-up as Loki, creating a more three-dimensional villain than in the Thor solo film and stealing every scene in which he appears.

The supporting characters are well-used in Whedon’s script too, from the familiarity between Pepper Potts and Agent Coulson to the interplay between Col. Fury and Agent Hill (Cobie Smulders). Stellan Skarsgard reprises his role as the scientist from Thor, and there is even a moment to note the whereabouts of Natalie Portman’s character.

This film is so good, such a perfect distillation of its various source materials, that I almost wish there did not have to be a sequel; but there almost certainly will be. As with all of the other films in this series, be sure to stay through the credits for not one but two credit cookies: the first of which made me nod knowingly, and the second made me laugh and say “oh, Joss.” I look forward to seeing it again, as soon as possible.

The Innkeepers (***)

4 May

I finally got around to watching this charming ghost story by writer/director Ti West, whose Cabin Fever 2 was a surprisingly good reframing of Eli Roth’s original. The Innkeepers is the story of Claire and Luke (Sara Paxton and Pat Healy), two young people in charge of an old small town inn on its last weekend of operation. The inn is vacant apart from a visiting actress (Kelly McGillis), a newly separated mother with her son, and a 19th century ghost that Luke swears to have seen once and is now trying to capture on audio. Claire offers to help, carrying his tape recorder and microphone through the deserted rooms while he sleeps during her part of the overnight shift.

Storywise, The Innkeepers is a straight-up traditional ghost story; the kind of thing they used to make all the time in the 1970s, possibly for television (I was reminded often of the original version of Don’t Be Afraid of the Dark). West has a gift for creating suspense through camera movement, and the additional element of the audio recording helps. This is not a film for gore enthusiasts; most of the horror is generated in the viewer’s mind. I enjoyed it a lot, both for what it is and for what it reminds me of.

The Raven (**)

3 May

I did not expect much from this film – the trailer makes it look pretty awful – but as it went through its rather predictable motions I did find myself warming to the combination of John Cusack’s way-serious Edgar Allan Poe and director James McTeigue’s vision of 19th century Baltimore. Luke Evans, Alice Eve, and Brendan Gleeson do a nice job of holding the center while Cusack runs around and chews the scenery.

The plot of the film is a literary mashup that reminded me of Nicholas Meyer’s Time After Time, in which H.G Wells uses a time machine to chase Jack The Ripper into the modern world. Other than its references to Poe’s actual history and his stories it is a by-the-numbers serial killer story – a sort of proto-Zodiac, lacking the Gothic charm of the many previous films based on Poe’s work. Unlike Poe’s stories, there is not much mystery or imagination in The Raven.

The Pirates! Band of Misfits (**1/2)

3 May

This is a pretty charming film from one of the great independent animation houses – Aardman, home to Wallace and Gromit and famous for using stop-motion and claymation for feature-length features and Oscar-winning shorts. They also do the occasional CG project, like Flushed Away and the extremely enjoyable Arthur Christmas. All of their films are characterized by a definite English sensibility and gentle good humour combined with a lot of sight gags. Hugh Grant and Martin Freeman lead the voice cast, with Grant a natural for the conflicted, sensitive Pirate Captain.

The Pirates is based on a children’s book of the same name, following the lackluster career of The Pirate Captain and his band of men (one of whom is a woman, dressed as a man in order to be near her secret love). Their mascot is a “plump parrot” called Polly; when the pirates commandeer Charles Darwin’s ship The Beagle, Darwin realizes that Polly is in fact a long-lost Dodo and begs the captain to allow him to present this find to the royal academy of science in London. Complicating matters is the fact that Queen Victoria – at least in this story – hates pirates more than anything but also covets rare exotic animals. The well-meaning Pirate Captain soon must choose between a royal pardon and his beloved pet.

This is a pretty good movie with a lot of laughs. I would not say I enjoyed it as much as Arthur Christmas or Wallace and Gromit, but it is well worth the effort of seeing it on the big screen if you get the chance.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 554 other followers

%d bloggers like this: