Tag Archives: Harry Potter

Chloe (***), Gone (**), The Chernobyl Diaries (**1/2), and The Woman in Black (**1/2)

30 May

A few movies to catch up on tonight, two of which happen to star Amanda Seyfried. Chloe is Atom Egoyan’s interesting tale of a middle-aged couple (Liam Neeson and Julianne Moore) who have a comfortable life and a lovely home shared with their teenaged son. Moore suspects that Neeson, a college professor, has been conducting an affair or two with his students. She notices a young prostitute (Seyfried) working near her office and, figuring that her husband would be attracted to her youth, concocts a plan to have the prostitute “accidentally” meet him and gauge his capacity for infidelity.

I’m not sure what most viewers would think of such a plan. As someone who believes in flexible relationships and honesty between partners, I figured it would end badly, and of course it does. I did appreciate that Egoyan’s script is complex enough that it does not demonize the prostitute, even as the relationship between the two women gets a lot more intimate. I did not always care for where the plot wanted to take me – especially in the end – but the actors did well with what they were given. Like some of his other films, Egoyan mixes eroticism with an examination of the moments in relationships that are rarely discussed.

Gone, on the other hand, is a by-the-numbers revenge picture where Seyfried is given a second chance to confront her kidnapper when he returns and takes her sister instead. She tries to tell the police, but they do not believe her, nor do they believe that she was ever kidnapped, due to lack of evidence. So, the film chiefly consists of her doggedly pursuing one slender clue after another, occasionally doubting her own sanity, but generally focused on revenge.

The Chernobyl Diaries was a surprisingly effective horror film set (of course) in the abandoned city adjacent to what remains of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant, which had a catastrophic meltdown over 25 years ago. Four young Americans and a couple of other tourists hire a Russian called Uri to take them there on what he promises to be a unique opportunity: to walk through the buildings of a place that had to be abandoned immediately. When they arrive at a security checkpoint, Uri is surprised that the guards refuse them entry, so he offers to take them in through a back road.

The tour proceeds as advertised; Uri parks his van in the town square and they walk through an apartment building, viewing the ruined power station from a balcony. Uri explains that the radiation levels are safe as long as they do not stay long and as long as they do not go close to the plant. When they return to the van and discover their distributor cap severed, you can imagine how things start to go terribly wrong.

The Chernobyl Diaries is not a great film but it is far better than I expected, especially in the first two thirds when the cast is still making their way through a creepy foreign landscape. I was not as enthusiastic about the nature of what terrorizes them, but it was appropriate enough given the setup. It felt like a bit of a wasted opportunity in the end.

The Woman in Black is probably best known for being Daniel Radcliffe’s first film after Harry Potter, and he is suitably serious as a young widower and father tasked with sorting through the estate of a house off the shore of a decidedly cursed English village. The house is haunted by the woman in black, who hung herself after her young son drowned in the nearby marsh due to the someone else’s negligence. Now, whenever the local children die – which is often – she can be seen in the background, driving them to do it.

Plotwise, The Woman in Black mixes both standard ghost story tropes with more contemporary ideas about how (and if) the ghost can be placated. The art direction is the true star here, not quite reaching the level of Alajandro Amenabar’s The Others but definitely in the same ballpark. Amusingly, this big-screen version shares the same source novel as a 1989 TV-movie starring Adrian Rawlins, who also played James Potter. From what I recall of the TV version, this new version is significantly darker.

The Hunger Games (***1/2)

28 Mar

I was scrolling through Netflix the other day and started watching a film called Racing With The Moon. It’s an early starring vehicle for Sean Penn and Nicolas Cage, circa 1984, with the bonus of a luminous young Elizabeth McGovern. What caught my eye in the description, though, was the fact that it was directed by Richard Benjamin, the actor turned director who made one of my all time favourite films: My Favourite Year, with Peter O’Toole. Both films are coming of age pictures, period pieces about young men stepping up into the real world. As Racing With The Moon started, I was surprised to see another well-known name in the credits: Steve Kloves. It was his first screenplay to be shot, when he was only 24 years old. Later he would go on to adapt Michael Chabon’s Wonder Boys, and a little series called Harry Potter, as well as the new Spider-Man film and the upcoming remake of Akira.

It is one thing to adapt a book or play that is not especially well known. Those who love the source material obviously hope for the best, but if the outcome is dismal or varies too wildly from the source, it is a relatively small population to offend. When a film is “pre-sold,” however, because the source material is well-known and beloved by millions (or billions) of fans who will scrutinize and compare and speculate, it’s a double-edged sword. The studio benefits from the guaranteed audience on opening night, but is also under much more intense pressure from all sides to please all sides: fans, critics, executives, foreign markets. And you still can’t please everybody, even if you pull off the impressive feat that Peter Jackson did with The Lord of the Rings. Our hyper-vigilant and supposedly media-savvy modern movie fan is not content to simply see the film and enjoy the story, they need to be on the winning side. They will grudgingly concede that John Carter was an entertaining film but they must mention in the same breath that Disney will lose a bundle on it, as if they are shareholders. Or they will perversely insist that the film was not good at all, seeking attention whether they have a valid criticism or not.

I liked the book this film was based on, very much. I think it is one of the best YA novels I have read in quite a while, and I have had a special interest in YA books for as long as I could read them. (Speaking of, Hollywood, the world could use some good films of Robert Cormier’s.) I liked this film, too. I think it successfully adapts the source, while making the changes necessary to work as a film. If you are one of those who whinges about spoilers, you may want to stop reading now.

The big reason I enjoyed the book (and slogged through the two lesser sequels) is the heroine, Katniss Everdeen. She is charismatic, admirable, dangerous – everything most young men or women would want to be, especially in her position. Jennifer Lawrence is brilliant as Katniss, and the supporting cast is generally working at her level, especially in the Capitol and the Games. For a long film it moves at a decent pace, dragging a bit here and there but covering the key moments well. The production design is impressive, contrasting the poor Districts 12 and 11 with the garish Capitol.

As my lovely fiancee pointed out after she saw the film, the single biggest change in the film script over the book is the fact that we do not hear Katniss’ inner monologue, nor is there any narration. This change does generally work, but as a result the film has to find other ways to communicate the same information. Some of those moments are lovely, like the brief scene of Gale looking at his mountain instead of watching the beginning of the games; or Haymitch watching the Capitol children play with a toy sword. Some are new but not unwelcome constructions, like the increased screen time for the President and his games master, or the exposition by Stanley Tucci as the reality show host. Sometimes the changes are frustrating and superficial. Some might be annoyed that the Katniss/Peeta/Gale love triangle was downplayed significantly, but I was glad, as I felt that was the weakest element of the books and was annoyed at how it was resolved. I was also glad that the muttations were simplified or minimized, wisely concluding that the drama of 24 kids trying to kill each other would be enough.

The only reason to consider The Hunger Games alongside Battle Royale, Harry Potter, or The Lord of the Rings is that they will all be enjoyed as both books and films a generation from now; which is more than I can say for Twilight. When you put aside all the fake entertainment “news” excitement, the fan expectations, the comparisons and the haters, what remains is a solid film about a strong girl in a dystopian future who becomes an unlikely hero. What’s not to love?

Video Game Roundup

11 Sep

After a bit of a drought, I find myself doing a fair bit of gaming lately. Here’s what I play the most (and I recognize that many of these are hardly new):

Lego Harry Potter, Years 1-4 (PS3): As always, fun to play through a series of beloved films in Lego form. The cutscenes have some amusing comments on the story; for example, when Lucius drops Tom Riddle’s diary into Ginny’s cauldron, she shrugs and smiles.

Final Fantasy XIII (PS3): I quite enjoy how this game works and I enjoy most of the characters, but as with many of the FF games, I find it hard to stay motivated during that long middle period where you level up for the final battle. Still, I think I will push through, and I am looking forward to the new online FF game.

Monopoly (iPhone): pretty much the board game. Fun though. You wind up doing a lot more auctioning than when you play against people.

Critter Crunch (PS3): fun and cute puzzle game with anime stylings available from PSN for just $6.99.

Scott Pilgrim (PS3): another PSN game, based on the comics and film, basically an 8-bit fighting game with some very cute touches. Very fun and well-made for a film tie-in.

Art Style: Cubello (Wii): this is not a new game at all but I still play it quite a bit and am approaching the last levels (I think). It’s a puzzle game where you try to remove groups of coloured cubes from a slowly rotating mass. Available through WiiWare. The other Art Style games, Rotohex and Orbient, are fun too.

Star Wars: The Clone Wars: Republic Heroes (PS3): Jack is primarily burning through this one, a series of missions based on the Clone Wars cartoon where you alternate playing as a jedi or a clone trooper. Pretty well designed and not super hard for kids.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 554 other followers

%d bloggers like this: